TV Day: Network toppers talk TV’s future
The panel agreed that TV is still a strong medium, and reaching audiences and advertisers on emerging digital platforms requires new revenue and ad integration models.
TV is very much alive, content is king, and broadcasters that secure new models to entice advertisers and audiences on emerging multiple platforms have a future.
That was the prevailing message during the TV CEO panel at TV Day Thursday at the Carlu.
The consensus among a panel, made up of Bell Media president Kevin Crull, TVA Group CEO Pierre Dion, Rogers Media president Keith Pelley, Shaw Media president and group VP broadcasting, Paul Robertson and CBC EVP of English services Kirstine Stewart, was that the TV experience has changed, but it retains strength as a key medium.
And while multiple platforms and social media complement the popularity TV content, connecting with digital audiences and advertisers requires new and different revenue models and ad integration solutions.
“We don’t have our head in the sand [about the fact that] there’s fragmentation and new media – it’s not really changing the importance of live viewing,” Bell Media’s Crull argued.
“Viewing video entertainment on multiple devices and on demand is a massive trend that we’re all participating and developing products to serve,” he added.
Rogers Media’s Pelley insisted that multiple platforms drive viewers back to TV by providing additional opportunities to experience popular broadcast content on alternate screens.
“I think multiplatform is critical. I do believe that the more that people experience it on different platforms, it leads to television. So the multiple platform devices on which people are consuming media are actually enhancing the television experience,” Pelley said.
TVA Group’s Dion reminded the TV Day audience that networks still need big shows to drive viewers to digital platforms.
“TV is still at the heart of convergence,” he added.
For broadcasters still paying top dollar for expensive TV rights, it wasn’t a surprise they agreed big event TV programming and audiences offer the biggest bang for the buck in an increasingly fragmented digital world.
“Great content is what matters. Lousy content on any screen is still lousy content,” Crull argued.
The challenge is coming up with advertising solutions.
“The great content [is] not a complicated business; you have to pay for that great content, either through advertising or…. through subscription. And I think that for mass media, subscription is a very hard business model,” Crull insisted.
“This is called mass media because it requires mass economics to fund programming,” he added.
What’s confounding broadcasters is that advertisers spend differently in the multi-platform universe by exploiting audience engagement opportunities across all platforms.
So TV networks have to find integrated ad solutions to accompany their programming offerings.
“Each program is now a brand that has a 360 degree approach to be on all platforms. I think advertisers and agencies see that when they get involved with a broadcaster, they get involved with different brands, and it’s a partnership to build up that brand,” Dion explained.
“I think at the end of the day, the winner is going to be the best brands with the best content integrated across multiple platforms, and engaging advertisers in that way,” Pelley agreed.
Winning formulas offered included packaging and presenting advertising solutions non-intrusively to engage consumers, and integrating advertisers from the get-go.
Shaw Media’s Robertson said successful monetization for TV networks will come when they change the way they measure impressions, for example, by aggregating data from VOD and mobile platforms in the same way linear TV accounts for viewership.
“Put it all together in the same bucket and call it video advertising, and sell it against a combined CPM with one measurement technique,” Robertson proposed.
But as with much else in broadcasting today, the CBC’s Stewart said a business case was required to justify setting out in new directions.
“If the money isn’t following or leading, it really does create a pressure point in not being able to invest in innovation if we can’t figure out how to make this work. Until we can figure out how to get revenue out of that value, it can really limit the way we go forward,” she added.
But Crull, while conceding multi-platform brand integration campaigns from the networks take time from both the broadcaster and the agency, argued both parties need to experiment to get the formula right.
“There’s no question that the monetization model is viable; I think we have a lot of work to do to take this art that we do to translate it into a science that can be measured,” he said.
Photo: L-R Keith Pelley, Kevin Crull, Kirstine Stewart, Pierre Dion, Paul Robertson / CityNews